Back The Woman in the Photograph Save as PDF
Chapters (65)
  1. Cover
  2. Praise for the previous work of
  3. Dedication
  4. Epigraph
  5. 24 April 2018
  6. Part 1: Subject
  7. 15 June 1968
  8. 20 June 1968
  9. July 1968
  10. 2 February 2018
  11. Part 2: Light
  12. 20 November 1970
  13. 20 November 1970
  14. 21 November 1970
  15. November 1970
  16. 19 February 2018
  17. Part 3: Focus
  18. 15 April 1977
  19. 18 April 1977
  20. 15 May 1977
  21. July 1977
  22. 26 February 2018
  23. 8 March 2018
  24. 8 March 2018
  25. Part 4: Distance
  26. 15 May 1979
  27. 15 May 1979
  28. 16 May 1979
  29. June 1979
  30. 29 March 2018
  31. 29 March 2018
  32. 27 March 2018
  33. Part 5: Movement
  34. 18 October 1981
  35. 10 April 2018
  36. 18 October 1981
  37. 10 April 2018
  38. 18 October 1981
  39. 10 April 2018
  40. 18 October 1981
  41. 10 April 2018
  42. 10 April 2018
  43. 18 October 1981
  44. 10 April 2018
  45. October 1981
  46. Part 6: Exposure
  47. July 1984
  48. 5 September 1984
  49. 24 April 2018
  50. 25 April 2018
  51. Part 7: Developing
  52. 26 April 2018
  53. Vee, in the lost place, 1984
  54. 26 April 2018
  55. Epilogue
  56. 5 February 2019
  57. Author’s Note
  58. Acknowledgements
  59. Letter from Author
  60. Stephanie Butland’s Readers’ Club
  61. For your Reading Group
  62. For discussion
  63. Select bibliography
  64. About the author
  65. Also by Stephanie Butland

This is not OK, John. I’ve been reading the newspapers (yes, I can read) and watching the news (yes, I can afford a television, which I bought with money I earned) and I see that the sisterhood has been getting a bit of stick. I see we, the protesters, have been accused of being jealous. If we had legs that long, or hair that glossy, or could make an impression on the world just by standing on a stage and letting people look at us, you say, we would do it. But we can’t. So we behave exactly the way you would expect silly, envious girls to behave. Sour grapes, you say.

This commentary (and I know it doesn’t all come from you, personally, but I also suspect that, when the men in your office or at the golf club have muttered about the way we ‘bloody feminists’ behaved, you haven’t stood up for us, which makes you part of the problem) presupposes that the best thing a woman can be is beautiful in the crippled, doll-like way the women at the stage on the Royal Albert Hall appeared. Men objecting to the protest on these grounds assume that women with cleverness, or curiosity, wit or bravery, would all willingly exchange those characteristics for a pert nose and a cute smile. Do you see how deep this all runs? Because that’s patriarchal thought in action, right there, and it’s wrong.

We did not throw rotten tomatoes at our sisters, we threw them at the man who was belittling them. We did not cover them in flour or shout at them. We object to the idea of being judged on our looks. We object to a man making jokes about cattle markets. We wish, with all of our hearts, that women did not think that their value is in their looks. That’s why we were protesting.

John, if there are women in your life that you love, next time you spend time with them, watch them. Do they eat less than you, or talk about the Grapefruit Diet? Do they always put on makeup before they go out? Do they ask you if they look OK?

If the answer to those questions is yes, I’m afraid that you’re a part of the problem.

Have you any idea how much time a Miss World competitor spends on her looks? (And make no mistake, she is a competitor, and it is a competition, woman against woman. Which is clever, because it stops women from seeing where the real battle is.) She will spend time every day moisturising and anointing different parts of her body with different potions, to make her skin softer or paler or sleeker. She will spend a long time in front of the mirror, trying to find flaws, not understanding that she is exactly as flawed, and flawless, as the rest of her sisters.