Back The Woman in the Photograph Save as PDF
Chapters (65)
  1. Cover
  2. Praise for the previous work of
  3. Dedication
  4. Epigraph
  5. 24 April 2018
  6. Part 1: Subject
  7. 15 June 1968
  8. 20 June 1968
  9. July 1968
  10. 2 February 2018
  11. Part 2: Light
  12. 20 November 1970
  13. 20 November 1970
  14. 21 November 1970
  15. November 1970
  16. 19 February 2018
  17. Part 3: Focus
  18. 15 April 1977
  19. 18 April 1977
  20. 15 May 1977
  21. July 1977
  22. 26 February 2018
  23. 8 March 2018
  24. 8 March 2018
  25. Part 4: Distance
  26. 15 May 1979
  27. 15 May 1979
  28. 16 May 1979
  29. June 1979
  30. 29 March 2018
  31. 29 March 2018
  32. 27 March 2018
  33. Part 5: Movement
  34. 18 October 1981
  35. 10 April 2018
  36. 18 October 1981
  37. 10 April 2018
  38. 18 October 1981
  39. 10 April 2018
  40. 18 October 1981
  41. 10 April 2018
  42. 10 April 2018
  43. 18 October 1981
  44. 10 April 2018
  45. October 1981
  46. Part 6: Exposure
  47. July 1984
  48. 5 September 1984
  49. 24 April 2018
  50. 25 April 2018
  51. Part 7: Developing
  52. 26 April 2018
  53. Vee, in the lost place, 1984
  54. 26 April 2018
  55. Epilogue
  56. 5 February 2019
  57. Author’s Note
  58. Acknowledgements
  59. Letter from Author
  60. Stephanie Butland’s Readers’ Club
  61. For your Reading Group
  62. For discussion
  63. Select bibliography
  64. About the author
  65. Also by Stephanie Butland

I wonder, were you impressed by the way my sisters and I took action? That we variously lumpen, big-nosed, gap-toothed women wanted to show that we are all valid members of the human race? Or were you upset that your night of looking at ‘perfect’ women in swimsuits and evening dresses was disrupted? Did it make for even more excitement? Did you imagine yourself wiping away the tears of those poor, frightened ‘beauty’ ‘queens’? In your dreams, did they look at you, pale but still beautiful, and whisper, ‘I’m afraid, John. All I want, really, is a good man to love me. Will you hold me?’

John, we need to talk about beauty contests. We really do. Because they are not, in any way, shape or form, cool.

Whereas women themselves, in any way, shape or form, ARE cool.

It’s not the way we look that matters.

I’d like to think I don’t have to explain this to you, but I’m going to spell it out, just to be on the safe side. Then, next year, if you notice that Miss World is on TV, you can go and do something more useful with your evening. Something a bit less oppressive. Like, have a conversation with a woman you know and like. Maybe go out for a meal. Maybe split the bill, because a lot of us feel a little intimidated at being ‘treated’. Listen as much as you talk. Just general equality in action, you know? (You don’t have to wait until next year to do that, though. Do it tomorrow, if you like.)

Unlike some of my sisters, I don’t think that you are automatically A Bad Thing, John, just because of the testosterone. I think you have been conditioned into thinking that women have a certain role to play in your life. Like: being beautiful. Wearing swimsuits and turning around so you can get a good look at their behind. Tricking, cajoling or nagging you into marrying them. And then doing all they can to not lose their looks, because we all know that if they put on a couple of pounds and realise lipstick is just another tool of oppression, you will be entirely justified in going back to the Royal Albert Hall and picking yourself a better beauty queen, next year. That’s the patriarchy. That’s how it works. If you have something that shape-shifts that you keep in your Y-fronts, you can just cruise on through your life, doing exactly what you like, surrounded by women doing what they’ve been trained to do. Please you, make you comfortable, do all they can so that you never, ever question your entitlement to taking anything you like from the world.