Back The Woman in the Photograph Save as PDF
Chapters (65)
  1. Cover
  2. Praise for the previous work of
  3. Dedication
  4. Epigraph
  5. 24 April 2018
  6. Part 1: Subject
  7. 15 June 1968
  8. 20 June 1968
  9. July 1968
  10. 2 February 2018
  11. Part 2: Light
  12. 20 November 1970
  13. 20 November 1970
  14. 21 November 1970
  15. November 1970
  16. 19 February 2018
  17. Part 3: Focus
  18. 15 April 1977
  19. 18 April 1977
  20. 15 May 1977
  21. July 1977
  22. 26 February 2018
  23. 8 March 2018
  24. 8 March 2018
  25. Part 4: Distance
  26. 15 May 1979
  27. 15 May 1979
  28. 16 May 1979
  29. June 1979
  30. 29 March 2018
  31. 29 March 2018
  32. 27 March 2018
  33. Part 5: Movement
  34. 18 October 1981
  35. 10 April 2018
  36. 18 October 1981
  37. 10 April 2018
  38. 18 October 1981
  39. 10 April 2018
  40. 18 October 1981
  41. 10 April 2018
  42. 10 April 2018
  43. 18 October 1981
  44. 10 April 2018
  45. October 1981
  46. Part 6: Exposure
  47. July 1984
  48. 5 September 1984
  49. 24 April 2018
  50. 25 April 2018
  51. Part 7: Developing
  52. 26 April 2018
  53. Vee, in the lost place, 1984
  54. 26 April 2018
  55. Epilogue
  56. 5 February 2019
  57. Author’s Note
  58. Acknowledgements
  59. Letter from Author
  60. Stephanie Butland’s Readers’ Club
  61. For your Reading Group
  62. For discussion
  63. Select bibliography
  64. About the author
  65. Also by Stephanie Butland

And then came Ursula’s interview: billed as ‘the inside story from Leonie Barratt’s real sister’. In fairness, Vee wasn’t the only one who got the hammer. Ursula, had looked sadly into the camera for some sub-David Bailey hack photographer who made her look overtired and over-madeup at the same time. It could have been deliberate, but if so, it was cruel. The journalist had been cruel, too, encouraging Ursula to talk about how the feminist movement had not only robbed her of a sister but robbed Leonie of peace of mind and the happy life she could have had.

‘People don’t die of a heart attack, grossly overweight and terribly lonely, for no reason,’ Ursula was quoted as saying, ‘I blame the choices my sister made. And I don’t mean overeating. Her so-called friends didn’t really support her, and Veronica Moon, who was supposed to be her best friend of all, watched her die for the sake of her own career. My poor sister Leonie was brainwashed by so-called feminists and she paid the price.’ The idea of Leonie being brainwashed was, theoretically, laughable, but Vee was empty of laughter. She was angry with Ursula, of course, but with the newspapers too, for encouraging her to leak her grief, to spill her story, to hurt herself, and Vee, and most of all, the memory of Leonie. How terrible for the most important thing about you to be the way you die. It added insult to the injury, so strongly felt by Vee now, that Leonie’s brilliance was never appreciated in her lifetime.

Editors called to cancel their commissions with her, just until things blew over, they said, but they never called again. Her wider circle of friends in the movement, too, got colder; or it could be that Vee had never been part of them, never more than a hanger-on. It could have been that, because she wouldn’t – couldn’t – talk about it, they thought she had something to hide, and the newspaper accounts of Leonie’s death were true.

She knew that in some quarters she had never been forgiven for photographing Thatcher, and that because she was successful, she seemed to be a sell-out. For all that Leonie had accused her of betraying her sisters, from time to time, it had been nothing more than provocation, really: a flexing of intellect, a poking at Vee to test that she was really solid, sound, a true sister. And Leonie never once gave her a hard time about earning good money, something Vee had always suspected was behind the hostility of some of the other women she knew in the movement. She had always been scrupulous about donating royalties to the causes she photographed, but that brought no warmth to some earth-mothers’ hearts.