Back The Sorority Murder
Chapters (61)
  1. Cover
  2. Praise
  3. Dedication
  4. One
  5. Two
  6. Three
  7. Four
  8. Five
  9. From the Missing Journal of Candace Swain
  10. Six
  11. Seven
  12. Eight
  13. Nine
  14. Ten
  15. Eleven
  16. Twelve
  17. From the Missing Journal of Candace Swain
  18. Thirteen
  19. Fourteen
  20. Fifteen
  21. From the Missing Journal of Candace Swain
  22. Sixteen
  23. Seventeen
  24. Eighteen
  25. Nineteen
  26. Twenty
  27. Twenty-One
  28. From the Missing Journal of Candace Swain
  29. Twenty-Two
  30. Twenty-Three
  31. Twenty-Four
  32. Twenty-Five
  33. Twenty-Six
  34. Twenty-Seven
  35. Twenty-Eight
  36. Twenty-Nine
  37. Thirty
  38. Thirty-One
  39. Thirty-Two
  40. Thirty-Three
  41. Thirty-Four
  42. From the Missing Journal of Candace Swain
  43. Thirty-Five
  44. Thirty-Six
  45. Thirty-Seven
  46. Thirty-Eight
  47. From the Journal of Candace Swain
  48. Thirty-Nine
  49. Forty
  50. Forty-One
  51. Forty-Two
  52. Forty-Three
  53. Forty-Four
  54. Forty-Five
  55. Forty-Six
  56. Forty-Seven
  57. Letter Found in the Journal of Candace Swain
  58. Forty-Eight
  59. Acknowledgments
  60. Booklist
  61. Excerpt

Lucas said, “I would ask the Concerned Sister who emailed me to consider Ms. Merritt’s questions. How can you be certain of the day? That this wasn’t another day before the party? That it was Sunday night? That it was in fact Candace?”

“Yes,” Regan said. “But let’s assume that she is confident in her memory. One reason I used the bank-robbery example was because fear creates certain stressors, and memories can be clearer—or completely off. If you’re scared, you may see a threat as worse than it is or a person as physically more imposing than they are. For example, I once helped investigate a string of bank robberies because a fugitive I was pursuing was involved. The fugitive was five feet ten inches tall and one hundred sixty pounds—not a large man. Virtually every witness identified him as over six feet, and one said he had to be two hundred pounds. But it was my fugitive, who has a distinctive tattoo on his neck, and that is what ultimately identified him. Yet, of the three witnesses I personally interviewed, no one had the tattoo accurate. One said it was an eagle, one a naked woman, and one a blob of blue ink. It was in fact Pegasus from Greek mythology. They all remembered, however, that it was on the left side of his neck.

“Fear can taint memories, but it can also solidify them. Interviewers need to be careful when drawing out details from a witness. We start with easy-to-confirm facts—time of day a crime occurred, day of the week, the purpose of the witness’s visit to that location, things like that. Make the witness comfortable with mundane, easy-to-remember details, and then start asking more specific questions about the event—in fact, asking the same question in different ways can help gain more accurate information. It’s also important to keep witnesses apart. There is a very real problem of confirmation bias, when a group of witnesses will agree to something that just isn’t accurate.”

Regan hoped she wasn’t overtalking, but Lucas seemed interested in her comments. He then said, “I am hoping that A Concerned Sister will call in—or email again—with the answers to these questions. Regan, what if someone didn’t come forward during the initial investigation, would they get in trouble now if they did speak up?”

“Most likely, no,” Regan said. “First, many people didn’t even know Candace had been missing, not until her body was found. Second, the police would have questioned those most likely to have answers—the people who last saw her at the party, her roommate who reported her missing, other sorority members, her boyfriends. They would have interviewed the staff at the golf course, and then after collecting and analyzing evidence, if that led them anywhere, they would have expanded the interviews.