Contents ( 51)
- Roberto Calasso
- Contents
- Note for Lucien
- Living in the Torrent
- Exempla Voluptatis
- The Grand Ball
- Treacherous Trifles
- Dismal Glory
- “The Mysterious Force of Legitimacy”
- Arcana Imperii
- The Origins of Sweetness
- Eulogius
- L’Autrichienne
- The Woodcutter and the Fisherman
- Goethe in Venice
- On Taste
- Metamorphoses of Style
- A Belated Nostalgia for Sorrow
- The Languor of a Park in Berry
- Around Port-Royal
- The Ruin of Kasch
- Among the Ruins of Kasch
- Elements of Sacrifice
- Law and Order
- The Forest Doctrine
- Archives and Will-o’-the-Wisps
- Postcards from the Quaternary
- The Demon of Repetition
- Goethe’s Birthday
- Sacrificial Crumbs
- The Antiromantic Child
- Limits
- Process
- Glosses on Marx
- Ricardo’s Ruthlessness
- Geldkristall
- History Makes Experiments
- The Artificial Barbarian
- Un frisson nouveau
- Behind the Glass
- Bien-aimé
- A Visit to Picpus
- “The Organization Wouldn’t Like That”
- The Moscow Doorkeeper
- Montaigne’s Wake
- The Wolf-Man Recalls
- Voices from the Palais-Royal
- Mundus Patet
- Letter from Saint Petersburg
- Notes
- THE BEGINNING
An acrobatic period in Talleyrand’s political career was the period of provisional government that he led in 1814. The whole of Europe then seemed suspended from one point—his bedroom on the mezzanine of his palace in rue Saint-Florentin. Talleyrand, by that time, was already the flotsam of three different tides: as bishop of the ancien régime, as sacrilegious drafter of revolutionary texts, and as Napoleon’s minister. But no one dared say it—and Tsar Alexander I slept soundly just a few meters above him. Baron de Vitrolles, who observed Talleyrand with blunt curiosity, though with devotion, since he still felt in him the presence of “mysteries impenetrable to the uninitiated,” noted: “It is difficult to form a view about the provisional government; it was entirely contained in the bedroom of M. de Talleyrand, on the mezzanine of his palace; his official staff consisted of various clerks assembled under the direction of Dupont de Nemours, the latest and best economist, and Roux-Laborie was the assistant secretary general.635, 636 M. de Talleyrand’s bedroom was open to all who knew him, men and women, and the conversations of all these people who came and went were the real deliberations on the affairs of state. Their main work was writing a few more or less witty articles for the newspapers, and this was called opinion-making. If, moreover, Prince Talleyrand was attracted by one idea among all those that passed through the head of those who came and went, he’d turn it into a decree, and the members of the government signed it on trust when they arrived, one by one, to visit their president.” The whole unwieldy liturgy of power is lost here in open chatter among those who come and go. And yet the sovereignty survives, like an undamaged crystal, even if it now lies hidden beneath the Prince’s many cushions. It will be a long time before Europe acknowledges it in such a casual form, and so close to its primordial state, aura and miasma. At the Congress of Vienna, a few months later, sovereignty already seemed worn down by a certain lack of inner substance. The monarchs of the Congress of Vienna and the parliamentarians of the Weimar Republic are tied by a morganatic bond. And thousands of torches would soon be lit at the Nuremberg stadium to summon the faded essence of sovereignty from the darkness, before bathing it in blood to revive its ghostly pallor.
The esprits forts of the eighteenth century became the Monsieur Homais of the nineteenth century and the common sense of the twentieth.
Only two attempts have been made so far to go beyond nihilism: the years of Hitler, the reunion of blood and earth, defeat of the Hebrew acids of the intellect; and the years of Stalin, launch of the “realm of freedom,” engineering of the soul.
One day the United States realized that it was an empire. But it didn’t know what an empire was. It believed itself to be the biggest of all corporations.