Back Good Calories, Bad Calories Save as PDF
Chapters (40)
  1. Cover Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Dedication
  4. Prologue A Brief History of Banting
  5. Part One
  6. Chapter 1
  7. Chapter 2
  8. Chapter 3
  9. Chapter 4
  10. Part Two
  11. Chapter 5
  12. Chapter 6
  13. Chapter 7
  14. Chapter 8
  15. Chapter 9
  16. Chapter 10
  17. Chapter 11
  18. Chapter 12
  19. Chapter 13
  20. Part Three
  21. Chapter 14
  22. Chapter 15
  23. Chapter 16
  24. Chapter 17
  25. Chapter 18
  26. Chapter 19
  27. Chapter 20
  28. Chapter 21
  29. Chapter 22
  30. Chapter 23
  31. Chapter 24
  32. Epilogue
  33. Notes
  34. Bibliography
  35. Acknowledgments
  36. Illustration Credits
  37. A Note About the Author
  38. Also by Gary Taubes
  39. Footnotes
  40. Copyright

Yudkin, J., V. V. Kakkar, and S. Szanto. 1969. “Sugar Intake, Serum Insulin and Platelet Adhesiveness in Men with and Without Peripheral Vascular Disease.” Postgraduate Medical Journal. Sept.; 45(527):608–11.

Yuncker, B. 1962. “The Fat Americans or Calories DO Count.” New York Post. April 23; 25. Zahorska-Markiewicz, B. 1980. “Weight Reduction and Seasonal Variation.” International Journal of Obesity. 4(2):139–43.

Zekry, D., J. J. Hauw, and G. Gold. 2002. “Mixed Dementia: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.” Journal of the American Geriatric Society. Aug.; 50(8):1431–38.

Zierler, K. L., and D. Rabinowitz. 1964. “Effect of Very Small Concentrations of Insulin on Forearm Metabolism: Persistence of Its Action on Potassium and Free Fatty Acids Without Its Effect on Glucose.” Journal of Clinical Investigation. May; 43:950–62.

Zimmet, P., K. G. Alberti, and J. Shaw. 2001. “Global and Societal Implications of the Diabetes Epidemic.” Nature. Dec. 13; 414(6865):782–87.

Zukel, W. J., O. Paul, and H. W. Schnaper. 1981. “The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). I. Historical Perspective.” Preventive Medicine. July; 10(4):387–401.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

It’s always dangerous, when challenging beliefs that are so passionately embraced, to acknowledge that you have paid attention to the skeptics who preceded you. This can be used as evidence that you are exceedingly gullible and will believe anything you read. Nonetheless, I concede that I indeed took seriously and am grateful for the efforts of those who trod portions of this path before me: in particular, Russell Smith, Uffe Ravnskov (and his International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics), Wolfgang Lutz, James Le Fanu, and Thomas Moore on the relationship between cholesterol and heart disease; Alfred Pennington, Herman Taller, and Robert Atkins on the subject of diet and weight; and Peter Cleave and John Yudkin, who came closest to putting it all together. I read the works of these authors with skepticism, but no more or less than that of other contributors to the literature. The book that may have been most influential in altering my perspective and yet never made it into this text, for reasons of narrative flow and length rather than relevance, was Weston Price’s 1939 classic Nutrition and Physical Degeneration: A Comparison of Primitive and Modern Diets and Their Effects.

Drafts of this book were read in part or in whole and corrections suggested by Robert Bauchwitz, John Benditt, Kenneth Carpenter, Michael Eades, Richard Feinman, Mark Friedman, Richard Hanson, David Jacobs, Cynthia Kenyon, Ron Krauss, Mitch Lazar, Jamie Robins, Bruce Schechter, Jeremy Stone, Clifford Taubes, Nina Teicholz, and Eric Westman. I am deeply grateful to all these individuals for their time, their efforts, and their acumen. Any errors in either fact or form, however, remain mine alone. I would also like to thank the literally hundreds of researchers, clinicians, and public-health authorities who took the time to speak with me at length, many of whom did so repeatedly, even though they fundamentally disagreed with articles I had already written on this subject.