Back In the Dark Save as PDF
Chapters (90)
  1. Cover
  2. IN THE DARK
  3. PRELUDE
  4. 1
  5. 2
  6. 3
  7. 4
  8. 5
  9. 6
  10. WIND LISTENERS
  11. Blind Abing
  12. 1
  13. 2
  14. 3
  15. 4
  16. 5
  17. 6
  18. 7
  19. 8
  20. 9
  21. 10
  22. 11
  23. 12
  24. 13
  25. 14
  26. 15
  27. 16
  28. 17
  29. 18
  30. 19
  31. 20
  32. 21
  33. WIND READERS
  34. An Angel with Problems
  35. 1
  36. 2
  37. 3
  38. 4
  39. 5
  40. 6
  41. 7
  42. 8
  43. 9
  44. 10
  45. 11
  46. 12
  47. 13
  48. 14
  49. 15
  50. 16
  51. 17
  52. 18
  53. 19
  54. 20
  55. 21
  56. 22
  57. 23
  58. 24
  59. 25
  60. 26
  61. 27
  62. 28
  63. 29
  64. 30
  65. THE SHADOW OF CHEN ERHU
  66. Diary Excerpts: 25 March 1987
  67. 26 March
  68. 27 March
  69. 28 March
  70. 2 April
  71. The Letter: Day One
  72. Day Two
  73. Day Three
  74. Day Four
  75. Day Five
  76. Day Six
  77. Day Seven
  78. Two Old Letters
  79. WIND-CATCHERS
  80. A Vietnamese Ghost Story
  81. 1
  82. 2
  83. 3
  84. 4
  85. 5
  86. 6
  87. 7
  88. 8
  89. 9
  90. THE BEGINNING

But our inability to find him an opponent meant he wasn’t able to play the game. So his life relapsed into one of dejected boredom. He had become trapped again – the danger of intellectual decrepitude lurked everywhere. Again we had to think of ways to keep him occupied, to give him something to do. We thought of travel, calligraphy, painting, qigong, t’ai chi – anything that might make him take an interest. But nothing worked. He was once more cold and detached – we were terribly discouraged. Once, a qigong teacher arrived in our residential area and many people decided to learn t’ai chi. I doggedly urged him to attend, for days, then a week; finally he agreed to study with a group of elderly people, about thirty men and women. Occasionally I went along with him and practised the moves, but even though Father had been going every day, and studying constantly, he still couldn’t perform the most basic moves – his movements were all over the place. He’d remember the first part of a move and then forget the final part; it was completely infuriating. Needless to say, his performance demonstrated his clumsiness. He seemed to be two different people: one a sublimely skilled go player possessed of immeasurable intelligence; the other, a clumsy old man unable to master the most basic moves of t’ai chi. It was quite bizarre. On the one hand he was a superman, a man of towering intelligence and skill; on the other, he was incorrigibly obstinate, slow-witted – nothing more than a drone. He was a man easily stuck in a rut, pigeon-holed into one particular thing that he couldn’t extricate himself from – so in a sense he was very limited. The only thing I had misgivings about was this: what was it, exactly, that allowed him to display such remarkable skill in the game of go? Was he truly a talented player who understood the game inside out, or was there some other reason for his success?