Back A Firing Offense Save as PDF
Chapters (57)
  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Dedication
  4. Epigraph
  5. Prologue
  6. I: PARIS (MAY–JULY 1994)
  7. 1
  8. 2
  9. 3
  10. 4
  11. 5
  12. 6
  13. 7
  14. 8
  15. II: WASHINGTON (JANUARY–MARCH 1996)
  16. 9
  17. 10
  18. 11
  19. 12
  20. 13
  21. 14
  22. 15
  23. 16
  24. 17
  25. 18
  26. 19
  27. III: WASHINGTON–BEIJING (MARCH–MAY 1996)
  28. 20
  29. 21
  30. 22
  31. 23
  32. 24
  33. 25
  34. 26
  35. 27
  36. 28
  37. 29
  38. 30
  39. IV: WASHINGTON–BOSTON–MONTREAL (MAY–JULY 1996)
  40. 31
  41. 32
  42. 33
  43. 34
  44. 35
  45. 36
  46. 37
  47. 38
  48. 39
  49. 40
  50. 41
  51. 42
  52. V: SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA (OCTOBER 1996)
  53. 43
  54. Acknowledgments
  55. Author’s Note
  56. Praise
  57. Also by David Ignatius

“Don’t be so serious, Eric,” she said finally. “You sound like the national security adviser. Now that you’re back home, you need to have fun. Live a little. Tell me something delicious and unserious.”

“Like what?” I wanted to please her.

“I don’t know.” She gave me coy look. “Like who you’re sleeping with. Not one of the copy aides, I hope. They’re not worthy of you.”

“No copy aides,” I said. That wasn’t quite true. I had asked one of the copy aides out the first week I was home, but that was purely recreational. “How about you?”

“Nobody in particular,” she said. She gave me a kiss and wandered off to talk to a cabinet member. I wasn’t offended that she had asked about my sex life, or that she had admonished me to have more fun. It seemed possible that she was suggesting I have fun with her, which remained an attractive idea, even after so many years and so much scar tissue.

I thought about Annie often after that first encounter, but I didn’t call her. It was too complicated. You don’t put a relationship like that back together by choice. It has to be a compulsion, forced on both of you by circumstances you can’t control.

10

10

I had been back in the bureau for about five months when I received a letter from Rupert Cohen. We had not communicated in any way since our brief contact in Paris. His letter was peculiar: very formal, carefully phrased, with no return address. It read as follows:

January 8, 1996

Dear Mr. Truell:

As you may recall, we met in May 1994 in Paris. You were seeking information, and I attempted to be helpful. While that puts you under no obligation to me, I hope you will consider this request for help.

I have served the U.S. government for more than a decade. What prompts this letter is that I have finally answered a question I was mulling over at the time we met, but did not share with you; namely, should one stay in government service when one is convinced that the ship is sinking? I have now answered that question in the negative. My organization, not in good shape when I joined, is in the process of imploding, collapsing due to its mediocrity.

Simply put, we have ceased to exist as a serious organization. We actually died, I think, quite a long time ago, but the enemy behind the Berlin Wall kept us going. It excused and camouflaged our gross inadequacies.