Back Voyage
Chapters (85)
  1. Annotation
  2. Voyageby Stephen Baxter
  3. AUTHOR’S NOTE
  4. Prologue
  5. Book OneDECISION
  6. Thursday, February 13, 1969
  7. Sunday, July 20, 1969
  8. Saturday, October 4, 1969
  9. Monday, October 27, 1969
  10. Monday, April 13, 1970
  11. Monday, April 13, 1970
  12. Tuesday, April 14, 1970
  13. Sunday, June 21, 1970
  14. Thursday, July 9, 1970
  15. Saturday, August 7, 1971
  16. Monday, August 16, 1971
  17. Wednesday, December 1, 1971
  18. Saturday, December 11, 1971
  19. Wednesday, January 5, 1972
  20. Book TwoTRAJECTORIES
  21. Wednesday, May 24, 1972
  22. Saturday, October 28, 1972
  23. Thursday, June 7, 1973
  24. Friday, July 20, 1973
  25. July 1976
  26. Sunday, August 15, 1976
  27. Wednesday, May 25, 1977
  28. June 1978
  29. Wednesday, July 5, 1978
  30. Monday, August 7, 1978
  31. Friday, December 8, 1978
  32. February 1979
  33. Monday, June 11, 1979
  34. Thursday, April 10, 1980
  35. Thursday, November 27, 1980
  36. Book ThreeAPOLLO-N
  37. Friday, November 28, 1980
  38. Monday, December 1, 1980
  39. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  40. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  41. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  42. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  43. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  44. Thursday, December 4, 1980
  45. Thursday, December 4, 1980
  46. Sunday, December 7, 1980
  47. Monday, December 15, 1980
  48. January 1981
  49. Tuesday, January 20, 1981
  50. Wednesday, January 21, 1981
  51. Friday, January 30, 1981
  52. Tuesday, February 3, 1981
  53. Friday, February 27, 1981
  54. March-April 1981
  55. Thursday, April 16, 1981
  56. Thursday, April 16, 1981
  57. Book FourAPPROACHES
  58. Wednesday, June 3, 1981
  59. June 1981
  60. Monday, July 6, 1981
  61. Wednesday, August 12, 1981
  62. Thursday, September 24, 1981
  63. January 1982
  64. Monday, January 11, 1982
  65. Saturday, June 5, 1982
  66. Tuesday, August 10, 1982
  67. Monday, December 6, 1982
  68. Monday, February 21, 1983
  69. November 1983
  70. Tuesday, November 8, 1983
  71. Thursday, July 12, 1984
  72. Monday, August 6, 1984
  73. August 1984
  74. Monday, August 13, 1984
  75. Monday, August 13, 1984
  76. Book FiveARES
  77. Friday, August 17, 1984
  78. Monday, December 3, 1984
  79. January 1985
  80. Monday, February 18, 1985
  81. Tuesday, February 26, 1985
  82. March 1985
  83. Thursday, March 21, 1985
  84. Book SixMANGALA
  85. LOST MARS

“…What about guidance and navigation? Don’t you realize that you’re now talking about devising a mission profile with possibly four planetary encounters? — Mars, Venus maybe twice, and Earth on return? And at each encounter the accuracy of positioning will have to be of the order of a few hundred miles, after traveling tens of millions. How can we navigate so accurately? Why, we haven’t yet proved we can manage a single swing-by on such a scale.”

“But we will,” Dana insisted. “Remember, NASA committed to the lunar-orbit rendezvous mode for Apollo — which required a rendezvous a quarter of a million miles from home — before a single space rendezvous had been demonstrated.”

There was some muttering at that. Hardly a valid comparison.

“What about the design constraints? Near Venus the sunlight is four times hotter than at Mars, so you’ll be sacrificing payload space for a cooling system that will be deadweight at Mars. And there’ll be problems with the increased level of radiation coming from the sun…”

Dana tried to answer — I’ve incorporated spacecraft design modifications into my weights analysis, and… But he was all but drowned out by the noise of an audience which had little interest in him.

Then Hans Udet stood up, and a hush gathered. Udet said precisely, “On what basis have you arrived at your figures? I am aware of the preliminary analyses of the complicated mission classes you describe. I am aware of no detailed analyses which show the savings you claim.”

Dana began to stammer out a reply. But our understanding of spacecraft systems has advanced since those early studies, and with the figures I have compiled, we can now show that -

“These results are false.” Udet glanced around at the audience — tall, aristocratic, in control, still charming. “This is obvious. The figures we are shown are based on unstated suppositions. The speaker doesn’t know what he’s talking about. It may be incompetence, or malice, whatever. We should not expend further energy on this red herring.” He sat down, his back ramrod-straight.

There was an uncomfortable stirring in the audience, some nervous laughter.

Bert Seger got to his feet, quickly thanked Dana, and turned away from him.

Udet’s words were incredible to Dana. Such accusations should not be made, in such fora as these, or beyond. It is — uncivilized. Somehow, though, now that it had happened, there seemed a certain inevitability about it all. Of course, I have been rejected. But this isn’t about logic, or engineering, or science. It was because he’d gone outside the hierarchy, the formal channels. This really is about power. Infighting. It’s possible Udet is even sincere. Maybe he really does think I’ve cooked up these numbers, that I’m just infighting for Langley.

Dana gathered together his foils, clumsily, and got off the stage.