Back Voyage
Chapters (85)
  1. Annotation
  2. Voyageby Stephen Baxter
  3. AUTHOR’S NOTE
  4. Prologue
  5. Book OneDECISION
  6. Thursday, February 13, 1969
  7. Sunday, July 20, 1969
  8. Saturday, October 4, 1969
  9. Monday, October 27, 1969
  10. Monday, April 13, 1970
  11. Monday, April 13, 1970
  12. Tuesday, April 14, 1970
  13. Sunday, June 21, 1970
  14. Thursday, July 9, 1970
  15. Saturday, August 7, 1971
  16. Monday, August 16, 1971
  17. Wednesday, December 1, 1971
  18. Saturday, December 11, 1971
  19. Wednesday, January 5, 1972
  20. Book TwoTRAJECTORIES
  21. Wednesday, May 24, 1972
  22. Saturday, October 28, 1972
  23. Thursday, June 7, 1973
  24. Friday, July 20, 1973
  25. July 1976
  26. Sunday, August 15, 1976
  27. Wednesday, May 25, 1977
  28. June 1978
  29. Wednesday, July 5, 1978
  30. Monday, August 7, 1978
  31. Friday, December 8, 1978
  32. February 1979
  33. Monday, June 11, 1979
  34. Thursday, April 10, 1980
  35. Thursday, November 27, 1980
  36. Book ThreeAPOLLO-N
  37. Friday, November 28, 1980
  38. Monday, December 1, 1980
  39. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  40. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  41. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  42. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  43. Wednesday, December 3, 1980
  44. Thursday, December 4, 1980
  45. Thursday, December 4, 1980
  46. Sunday, December 7, 1980
  47. Monday, December 15, 1980
  48. January 1981
  49. Tuesday, January 20, 1981
  50. Wednesday, January 21, 1981
  51. Friday, January 30, 1981
  52. Tuesday, February 3, 1981
  53. Friday, February 27, 1981
  54. March-April 1981
  55. Thursday, April 16, 1981
  56. Thursday, April 16, 1981
  57. Book FourAPPROACHES
  58. Wednesday, June 3, 1981
  59. June 1981
  60. Monday, July 6, 1981
  61. Wednesday, August 12, 1981
  62. Thursday, September 24, 1981
  63. January 1982
  64. Monday, January 11, 1982
  65. Saturday, June 5, 1982
  66. Tuesday, August 10, 1982
  67. Monday, December 6, 1982
  68. Monday, February 21, 1983
  69. November 1983
  70. Tuesday, November 8, 1983
  71. Thursday, July 12, 1984
  72. Monday, August 6, 1984
  73. August 1984
  74. Monday, August 13, 1984
  75. Monday, August 13, 1984
  76. Book FiveARES
  77. Friday, August 17, 1984
  78. Monday, December 3, 1984
  79. January 1985
  80. Monday, February 18, 1985
  81. Tuesday, February 26, 1985
  82. March 1985
  83. Thursday, March 21, 1985
  84. Book SixMANGALA
  85. LOST MARS

Udet said, “We tried to shut down. But the moderator was too far out of the core to have any immediate effect. The hydrogen in the core and the jacket boiled quickly and started to expand…”

“And now you’ve got a runaway,” Muldoon continued. “Because the reactor was designed with a positive temperature coefficient.”

Michaels sighed and locked his hands behind his head. “Just pretend I don’t know what you’re talking about.”

Muldoon grinned tightly. “I know. It took me a while to figure this stuff out. Look: suppose the temperature of your core rises. And suppose that the core is designed so that when it heats up, the reactivity drops — that is, the reaction rate automatically falls. That’s what’s meant by a ‘negative temperature coefficient.’ In that case you have a negative feedback loop, and your reaction falls off, and the temperature is damped down.”

“Okay. It’s kind of self-correcting.”

“That’s right; the whole thing is stable. That’s how they design civilian reactors. But in the case of NERVA, that coefficient was positive, at least for some of the temperature range. So when the temperature went up, the reactivity went up, too—”

“And the rate of fission increased, leading to a further temperature rise.”

“And so on. Yes.”

Michaels glared at Udet. “I can see the fucking headlines now, Hans. Why the hell did we fly an unstable reactor?”

Udet sat forward, his face pale, a muscle in his neck rope-taut with anger. “You must understand that we are not building a reactor to supply domestic electricity, here. We are not heating coffeepots. NERVA 2 is a high-performance booster, a semiexperimental flight model. Stability is not always the condition we require.”

Michaels frowned. And you just hate having to answer these asshole questions, don’t you, Hans? “Why do we need instability? What do you mean?”

Seger put in, “It’s like a high-performance aircraft, Fred. A ship that’s too stable will wallow like a sow. So you might design for instability. If a bird’s unstable, it can flip quickly from one mode to another; if you can control that, you’ve gained a lot of maneuverability”

“But that’s a big if, Bert. And evidently, when it got to the wire, we couldn’t control it. Hans, why didn’t you beef up the control system to cover for this?”

Udet punctuated his words by thumping the edge of his hand on Michaels’s desk. “Because — of — unacceptable — weight — penalties.”

Michaels dreaded having to put this man in front of the commission. “Let’s move on. What next?”