Back The Heights Save as PDF
Chapters (88)
  1. Title Page
  2. Copyright Page
  3. Dedication
  4. ONE
  5. KATE
  6. TIM
  7. BEA MYERLY
  8. KATE
  9. TIM
  10. KATE
  11. TIM
  12. TIM
  13. TWO
  14. KATE
  15. BEA MYERLY
  16. TIM
  17. KATE
  18. ABIGAIL HOSFORD
  19. TIM
  20. KATE
  21. JEFF SLADE
  22. TIM
  23. KATE
  24. TIM
  25. THREE
  26. KATE
  27. TIM
  28. KATE
  29. TIM
  30. KATE
  31. TIM
  32. KATE
  33. TIM
  34. BEA MYERLY
  35. KATE
  36. BEA MYERLY
  37. TIM
  38. KATE
  39. TIM
  40. KATE
  41. TIM
  42. FOUR
  43. TIM
  44. KATE
  45. TIM
  46. KATE
  47. TIM
  48. KATE
  49. TIM
  50. KATE
  51. TIM
  52. KATE
  53. ABIGAIL HOSFORD
  54. KATE
  55. TIM
  56. KATE
  57. TIM
  58. FIVE
  59. KATE
  60. TIM
  61. KATE
  62. TIM
  63. KATE
  64. TIM
  65. KATE
  66. TIM
  67. KATE
  68. TEDDY
  69. TIM
  70. KATE
  71. TIM
  72. KATE
  73. TIM
  74. BEA MYERLY
  75. KATE
  76. JEFF SLADE
  77. KATE
  78. TIM
  79. KATE
  80. TIM
  81. BEA MYERLY
  82. TIM
  83. KATE
  84. BEA MYERLY
  85. KATE
  86. TIM
  87. KATE
  88. BEA MYERLY

LATER, THERE WOULD BE MUCH TO REMEMBER: THOSE EARLY, AWKWARD MOments; the somber mood of the committee; the poorly lit conference room and the squeaky pale green plastic chair where I sat sweating; the meandering opening statement wherein Dr. Jamison Lamson, who had misplaced his notes, had to wing it; my surprise at Dr. Lamson’s pronouncement that he’d never had a more frustrating student; my confusion, then clarity, regarding his strategy, for my mentor had deftly anticipated the criticisms of the other advisers, and he battered me in such an aggressive way that it must have engendered sympathy in the others, because within minutes it wasn’t a defense, it was a love fest, a party of my now-peers, and what a pity I wasn’t entirely present for the experience, how unfortunate that I only half heard my harshest critic, Dr. Rejandra Kanwar, cop to having had years of skepticism and say, “I never thought a dissertation could straddle Rosa Parks and Pliny the Younger, but somehow, Mr. Welch, you’ve found a way!” and Dr. Rita Lovejoy, who was in awe of my use of minor players to illuminate the “great stage of world history” and how my dissertation “went down like a milk shake but boasted the sharpness and finesse of a complex wine,” and while the three doctors struggled to outdazzle one another, this thought occurred to me: I wish Kate were here to witness this. She would’ve liked it. But that thought gave over to other, more pressing concerns, how I was dizzy from lack of sleep and weak from lack of food, and most especially, how I had gas. All of which kept me from confronting what I most feared. I’d been told that very often during a dissertation defense, the exchange between advisers and advisee evolves to a more personal expression of thought. Out slips the unknown, never-spoken, real motive for the years of research, leaving the doctoral candidate exposed, as if having been subjected to a full-body X-ray—as if to say, Here, these are my bones.

I wanted to avoid that moment. Could I get through my defense without it? If only I’d kept quiet after Dr. Lamson asked, “Is there anything else you’d like to say?” See, part of me didn’t believe their uniform praise. Look at them, I thought. Surely they have a criticism or two—it can’t all be completely wonderful—have they even read what I wrote? Maybe they didn’t understand it. Maybe they didn’t know anything. Maybe I needed to teach them!

So instead of thanking them and exiting fast, I stood motionless, stared incredulously, and said, “Is that it? Is that all?”

They looked back at me. Smiling. Satisfied. “It’s been a delight.” Dr. Kanwar grinned. “Like Christmas in May,” Dr. Lovejoy cooed.