Back The Andromeda Strain Save as PDF
Contents ( 40)
  1. CONTENTS
  2. Acknowledgments
  3. DAY 1 Contact
  4. 1. The Country of Lost Borders
  5. 2. Vandenberg
  6. 3. Crisis
  7. 4. Alert
  8. DAY 2 Piedmont
  9. 5. The Early Hours
  10. 6. Piedmont
  11. 7. "An Unusual Process"
  12. 8. Directive 7-12
  13. 9. Flatrock
  14. 10. Stage I
  15. 11. Decontamination
  16. DAY 3 Wildfire
  17. 12. The Conference
  18. 13. Level V
  19. 14. Miscellaneous
  20. 15. Main Control
  21. 16. Autopsy
  22. 17. Recovery
  23. 18. The Noon Conference
  24. 19. Crash
  25. 20. Routine
  26. 21. The Midnight Conference
  27. DAY 4 Spread
  28. 22. The Analysis
  29. 23. Topeka
  30. 24. Evaluation
  31. 25. Willis
  32. 26. The Seal
  33. 27. Scared to Death
  34. 28. The Test
  35. 29. Three Minutes
  36. DAY 5 Resolution
  37. 30. The Last Day
  38. Epilogue
  39. References

Hall was still frowning. "But why me?"

"Because you are single. We have to have one unmarried man."

Stone opened a briefcase and withdrew a file. He gave it to Hall. "Read that."

It was a Wildfire file.

"Page 255," Stone said.

Hall turned to it.

PROJECT: WILDFIRE

ALTERATIONS

1. Millipore® Filters, insertion into ventilatory system. Initial spec filters unilayer styrilene, with maximal efficiency of 97.4% trapping. Replaced in 1966 when Upjohn developed filters capable of trapping organisms of size up to one micron. Trapping at 90% efficiency per leaf, causing triple-layered membrance to give results of 99.9%. Infective ratio of .1% remainder too low to be harmful. Cost factor of four- or five-layered membrance removing all but .001% considered prohibitive for added gain. Tolerance parameter of 1/1,000 considered sufficient. Installation completed 8/12/66.

2. Atomic Self-Destruct Device, change in detonator close-gap timers. See AEC/Def file 77-12-0918.

3. Atomic Self-Destruct Device, revision of core maintenance schedules for K technicians, see AEC/Warburg file 77-14-0004.

4. Atomic Self-Destruct Device, final command decision change. See AEC/Def file 77-14-0023. SUMMARY APPENDED.


SUMMARY OF ODD MAN HYPOTHESIS: First tested as null hypothesis by Wildfire advisory committee. Grew out of tests conducted by USAF (NORAD) to determine reliability of commanders in making life/death decisions. Tests involved decisions in ten scenario contexts, with prestructured alternatives drawn up by Walter Reed Psychiatric Division, after n-order test analysis by biostatistics unit, NIH, Bethesda.

Test given to SAC pilots and groundcrews, NORAD workers, and others involved in decision-making or positive-action capacity. Ten scenarios drawn up by Hudson Institute; subjects required—to make YES/NO decision in each case. Decisions always involved thermonuclear or chem-biol destruction of enemy targets.

Data on 7420 subjects tested by H¹H² program for multifactorial analysis of variance; later test by ANOVAR program; final discrimination by CLASSIF program. NIH biostat summarizes this program as follows:


It is the object of this program to determine the effectiveness of assigning individuals to distinct groups on the basis of scores which can be quantified. The program produces group contours and probability of classification for individuals as a control of data.

Program prints: mean scores for groups, contour confidence limits, and scores of individual test subjects.


K.G. Borgrand, Ph.D. NIH


RESULTS OF ODD MAN STUDY: The study concluded that married individuals performed differently from single individuals on several parameters of the test. Hudson Institute provided mean answers, i.e. theoretical "right" decisions, made by computer on basis of data given in scenario. Conformance of study groups to these right answers produced an index of effectiveness, a measure of the extent to which correct decisions were made.

Group

Index of Effectiveness

Married males

.343

Married females

.399

Single females

.402

Single males

.824

The data indicate that married men choose the correct decision only once in three times, while single men choose correctly four out of five times. The group of single males was then broken down further, in search of highly accurate subgroups within that classification.