Back Good Calories, Bad Calories
Chapters (40)
  1. Cover Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Dedication
  4. Prologue A Brief History of Banting
  5. Part One
  6. Chapter 1
  7. Chapter 2
  8. Chapter 3
  9. Chapter 4
  10. Part Two
  11. Chapter 5
  12. Chapter 6
  13. Chapter 7
  14. Chapter 8
  15. Chapter 9
  16. Chapter 10
  17. Chapter 11
  18. Chapter 12
  19. Chapter 13
  20. Part Three
  21. Chapter 14
  22. Chapter 15
  23. Chapter 16
  24. Chapter 17
  25. Chapter 18
  26. Chapter 19
  27. Chapter 20
  28. Chapter 21
  29. Chapter 22
  30. Chapter 23
  31. Chapter 24
  32. Epilogue
  33. Notes
  34. Bibliography
  35. Acknowledgments
  36. Illustration Credits
  37. A Note About the Author
  38. Also by Gary Taubes
  39. Footnotes
  40. Copyright

Gehrmann and Du Pont’s industrial-medicine division: Kehoe 1960. Gehrmann was prompted: Woody 1950. Footnote. Quoted in Pennington 1951b.

“We had urged…”: Quoted in Woody 1950.

“Notable was a lack…”: Pennington 1949. “In a few cases…”: Pennington 1953c. Footnote. Pennington 1952 (“even an apple”).

Holiday magazine: Woody 1950. Harvard symposium: Barr et al. 1953 (Hegsted’s comments, 137).

Pennington in NEJM: Pennington 1953c. JAMA took the position: Anon. 1952. Lancet: Anon. 1953.

“a surprisingly large…”: Hamlyn 1953. “Pennington’s idea…”: Greene 1953. “Pennington has hardly proved…”: Anon. 1954.

Thorpe at AMA meeting: Thorpe 1957.

JAMA still insisted: Anon. 1958 (“adequate in all…,” “the most reasonable…,” “least harmful”). Footnote. See White 1962; Anon. 1973.

“The edibility…,”: Ohlson et al. 1955:173. Footnote. Ibid.

Ohlson initially tested: Cederquist et al. 1952 (“subjects reported lack…”).

“Without exception…”: Ibid.

Over a ten-year period: Ohlson et al. 1955 (“dry, uninteresting…,” “sufficient to provide…,” “uniformly,” “did not appear…,” “they also appeared…,” 185).

“can only mean that replenishment…”: Ibid.:177.

Young tested diet on women: Young 1952 (“unanimous in saying…,” “despite an unusually,” “reported that their skins…,” “No excessive fatigue…”); Young et al. 1953. Male students: Young et al. 1957 (“in every case”).

Bruch noted: Bruch 1957:353,371–76.

Leith reported: Leith 1961.

“To be honest…”: Interview, Per Björntorp. “There’s no point…”: Interview, George Bray.

“excessive fatigue…”: Cederquist et al. 1952.

“The absence of complaints…”: Wilder 1933 Bistrian and Blackburn reported: Palgi et al. 1985. “People loved it”: Interview, George Blackburn. For confirmation of the absence of hunger, see Wadden et al. 1985. Footnote. Dietz 1989.

1000 calories: Rabast et al. 1978; Rabast et al. 1979. 1,200 calories: Krehl et al. 1967. 1,320 calories: Gordon et al. 1963. 2,200 calories: Palmgren and Sjövall 1957. More than 2,700 calories: Milch et al. 1957. “encouraged to eat…”: LaRosa et al. 1980.

Comparisons with low-calorie diets: Hanssen 1936; Palmgren and Sjövall 1957; Silverstone and Lockead 1963; Peña et al. 1979 (“eat as much…”).337 Kemp’s three papers: Kemp 1963 (“One is that other…,” “a working hypothesis…,” “possible for the first time…”); Kemp 1966; Kemp 1972.

Beginning in 1956: Kemp 1972.