Back The City on the Edge of Forever Save as PDF
Chapters (31)
  1. Publisher's Note
  2. Acknowledgments
  3. Epigraph
  4. Photo
  5. Epigraph
  6. Would You Buy a Used Galaxy From This Man?
  7. Introductory Essay
  8. Author's Note
  9. Perils of the "City"
  10. Endnotes
  11. Treatments
  12. March 21, 1966
  13. May 13, 1966
  14. Prologue
  15. Act One
  16. Act Two
  17. Act Three
  18. Act Four
  19. Epilogue
  20. Appendix
  21. Act One
  22. Afterwords
  23. WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE AND WHY ARE THEY IN THIS BOOK...
  24. Peter David
  25. D.C. Fontana
  26. David Gerrold
  27. DeForest Kelley
  28. Walter Koenig
  29. Leonard Nimoy
  30. Melinda M. Snodgrass
  31. George Takei

A great deal of the most passionate and inventive and imaginative writing in the genre was done during the ’60s and early ’70s. Some of the best was done by Harlan. Much of the rest was done by people who were inspired or angered by Harlan’s furious calls to glory. Whether you agreed or disagreed, you could not ignore the fires that were burning. Old visions were being vaporized. New ones were being forged. There was a lot of heat and fury—but there was a lot of illumination as well. It was an exciting time to be a writer; it was a great time to be learning one’s craft—because there were so many options to explore.

Curiously, this was also the moment in time when Star Trek began to assert its influence on the genre. In one respect at least, that influence has been a pernicious one: the allure of catching some of Star Trek’s fame and glory and wealth has caused too many good writers to lower not only their standards, but their goals as well. Science fiction used to be a dangerous literature. Now, it is a very commercial genre, and whatever dangers might still lurk within seem to have been safely sanitized for the marketplace. The real crime is that the lobotomy has been self performed.

I suspect that only a small part of Harlan’s disdain for Star Trek is the result of his own experience with the steamroller of lies that follows in its wake; the larger part must surely come from realizing that Star Trek is also a series of broken promises and missed opportunities to expand the range of what is possible in the genre.

You see, Harlan Ellison is a writer.

I’m going to have to explain this.

I’m only a storyteller. Harlan Ellison is a writer.

I tell stories for a living. I write about people who have problems and what they do to solve those problems and what they learn in the process. I try to make the people and the situations interesting and understandable. I try to keep the language as clear as possible because I’m terrified of looking silly in print. Only occasionally do I succumb to temptation and try to get my prose airborne—usually, the next morning, my head hurts and I’m embarrassed by the stylistic excesses committed to paper.

But Harlan Ellison is a writer. And that’s a whole other kind of critter than a mere storyteller.