Back Shoppers Save as PDF
Contents ( 9)
  1. Shoppers
  2. Denis Johnson
  3. Contents
  4. HELLHOUND ON MY TRAIL
  5. SHOPPERS CARRIED BY ESCALATORS INTO THE FLAMES
  6. About the Author
  7. ALSO BY DENIS JOHNSON
  8. Copyright
  9. About the Publisher

WOMAN: Riggs who?

MAN: Riggs the wimp. You don’t have to worry about Riggs. Just—that’s who you’re up against. There’s Riggs, and Northup. And Toast.

WOMAN: Toast.

MAN: Jack Toast. It’s an unusual name but it’s not unheard of.

WOMAN: Who’s Jack Toast?

MAN: Toast?…I’m—me. That’s—

WOMAN: Toast.

TOAST: I thought you knew the lineup.

Pause.

WOMAN: Are you sure you have the right—

TOAST: I’m not sure. I just guessed. Are you Katherine Wendell?

WOMAN: Kate.

TOAST: John Toast.

They shake hands.

KATE: Well. (Pause.) Well. If I’ve met one-third of the team, I guess I should feel about thirty-three percent less nervous. (She fumbles her cup but manages not to spill.)

TOAST: I’m not a worry. I’d be a tiger in any investigation, but this isn’t my investigation. I’m only monitoring.

KATE: Investigation?

TOAST: Interview.

KATE: Well, which is it? I was told—

TOAST: Interview. It’s an interview.

KATE: Well, why did you say—

TOAST: Generally I do conduct investigations. But in this case that is not the case.

KATE: Well—

TOAST: I’m monitoring an interview.

KATE: Well, John—

TOAST: Jack.

KATE:—Jack, John—what’s the difference?

TOAST: I prefer Jack.

KATE: Mr. Toast… What is the difference…between an interview and an investigation.

Pause.

TOAST (after some thought): An “investigation” might consist of a series of interviews. But an interview would be unique. Unrepeatable. An “investigation” would seek facts to be submitted in a report. An interview would seek an interchange to be reported in a memo. An “investigation” is terrifying. An interview—

KATE: Isn’t? Then why am I terrified?

TOAST: You’ve got the jitters. Six pots of coffee—

KATE: Why are you monitoring—

TOAST: Well, that’s what I do.

KATE: I thought you conducted—

TOAST: I do. I am an investigator. In this case the monitoring process is part of a larger inquiry.

KATE: An inquiry? Now that’s terrifying.

TOAST: Yes. (Pause.) It’s the most terrifying thing in our business. But not for you.

KATE: No?

TOAST: Not in this case, because the inquiry isn’t about you. It only has to do with your District…Look. Whenever your District has initiated a process to result in termination, inevitably that process—

KATE: Am I being terminated?

TOAST (amused): Uh. Wait a minute. Let’s back up!

KATE:—Because I thought I was just gonna go in there, it takes about thirty minutes, describe the circumstances, her actions, Marigold Cassandra—I brought my notes—

TOAST: Hey—(Mollifying gestures.)

KATE: I didn’t bring any notes about me.

TOAST: I can see how you might—

KATE: I really came to see the opera! This was just—

TOAST: Wait a second. All the way back—

KATE: Madame Butterfly! And now I’m being—

TOAST: Kate—

KATE: Oh!…You’re firing her. They, I mean, the District. Not you.

TOAST: Let’s back up. (Pause.) You came in. You looked around. I looked like whatsis—

KATE: The Siberian Shaman.

TOAST:—Jenks. Bill.

KATE: I do have the jitters. I’m sorry.

TOAST: We said hi: “Hi!” “Hi!” And here we are on the espresso express in a room full of Germans.