Chapters (40)
- FOREWORD
- RAILROAD OF DEATH
- REFERENCE LIST:
- Railroad of Death
- PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION (1948)
- INTRODUCTION
- PART ONE: SINGAPORE
- CHAPTER 1
- CHAPTER 2
- CHAPTER 3
- CHAPTER 4
- CHAPTER 5
- PART TWO: RAILROAD OF DEATH
- CHAPTER 6
- CHAPTER 7
- CHAPTER 8
- CHAPTER 9
- CHAPTER 10
- CHAPTER 11
- CHAPTER 12
- CHAPTER 13
- PART THREE: BASE CAMPS AND LIBERATION
- CHAPTER 14
- CHAPTER 15
- CHAPTER 16
- CHAPTER 17
- CHAPTER 18
- CHAPTER 19
- CHAPTER 20
- APPENDIX ONE:
- APPENDIX TWO:
- APPENDIX THREE:
- APPENDIX FOUR:
- APPENDIX FIVE:
- APPENDIX SIX:
- APPENDIX SEVEN:
- APPENDIX EIGHT:
- APPENDIX NINE:
- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- And The Dawn Came Up Like Thunder
2nd/Lt Ino Takeo, the Court find you guilty of the first Charge and NOT GUILTY of the second Charge.
The Findings of the Court are subject to confirmation.
SENTENCES OF THE COURT
(Court) The Court sentence the accused, Ship Master Odake Bunji to be imprisoned for six months.
The Court sentence the accused, Lt. Ino Takeo to be imprisoned for three months.
The sentences of the Court are subject to confirmation.
MITIGATION
Defence Counsel
ABE Taro
“Railroad of Death” by John Coast reads, “And we were particularly lucky in the Nip who commanded us, a Lieutenant INO . . . but thanks to INO, Camp 203 was easily the best in the area. Though some may think my estimate too high, you came across about three per cent of Nips like MASHUSTA, INO, Fuji and others, who were humane, kind, thoroughly decent people.” [Editor’s note: the same passage from Railroad of Death had been presented as part of the defence evidence during the trial.]
I, Defence Counsel, want to point out that INO, like ODAKE, has made amends for his sin and guilt by suffering pains in the jail since the 24th of September, 1945.
Signed on this 11th day of September, 1947
Taro Abe
Defence Counsel
Confirmation assessment by Office of the D.J.A.G., General H.Q.
| REGISTERED | IMMEDIATE CONFIDENTIAL |
| BM/JAG/65246 Office of the DJAG, General Headquarters, Far East Land Forces. 29th September, 1947. | |
| Commander Singapore District |
|
| Subject: |
War Crimes Trial Reference proceedings of the trial of
Both of the Imperial Japanese Forces . . . |
The defence pointed out that the number due for embarkation was fixed by Anchorage Command and was not the responsibility of either the ship’s master or the draft conducting officer. They could do nothing regarding that matter. The Asaka Maru was a cargo boat which was requisitioned and had once carried 3000 troops. Conditions then were far worse. Rations were issued on a fixed scale and could not be altered; sanitary equipment was also the responsibility of Anchorage Command. Both accused gave evidence to show that each in his sphere had done all that was possible in very difficult circumstances but that war conditions and the port authorities made their task well nigh impossible . . .
One prosecution witness gives evidence regarding some specific instance of beating by the guards but it does not implicate the accused as neither was proved to have known of it. There is no other proof of this type of offence.