Back Manfred Save as PDF
Chapters (57)
  1. Manfred
  2. Manfred
  3. INTRODUCTION TO MANFRED
  4. Scene II.—The Mountain of the Jungfrau.—Time, Morning.—Manfred alone upon the cliffs.
  5. Scene IV.—The Hall ofArimanes.—Arimanes on his Throne, a Globe of Fire, surrounded by the Spirits.
  6. Scene IV.—Interior of the Tower.
  7. The Life of Lord Byron by John Galt
  8. AUTHOR’S INTRODUCTION
  9. CHAPTER I
  10. CHAPTER II
  11. CHAPTER III
  12. CHAPTER IV
  13. CHAPTER V
  14. CHAPTER VI
  15. CHAPTER VII
  16. CHAPTER VIII
  17. CHAPTER IX
  18. CHAPTER X
  19. CHAPTER XI
  20. CHAPTER XII
  21. CHAPTER XIII
  22. CHAPTER XIV
  23. CHAPTER XV
  24. CHAPTER XVI
  25. CHAPTER XVII
  26. CHAPTER XVIII
  27. CHAPTER XIX
  28. CHAPTER XX
  29. CHAPTER XXI
  30. CHAPTER XXII
  31. CHAPTER XXIII
  32. CHAPTER XXIV
  33. CHAPTER XXV
  34. CHAPTER XXVI
  35. CHAPTER XXVII
  36. CHAPTER XXVIII
  37. CHAPTER XXIX
  38. CHAPTER XXX
  39. CHAPTER XXXI
  40. CHAPTER XXXII
  41. CHAPTER XXXIII
  42. CHAPTER XXXIV
  43. CHAPTER XXXV
  44. CHAPTER XXXVI
  45. CHAPTER XXXVII
  46. CHAPTER XXXVIII
  47. CHAPTER XXXIX
  48. CHAPTER XL
  49. CHAPTER XLI
  50. CHAPTER XLII
  51. CHAPTER XLIII
  52. CHAPTER XLIV
  53. CHAPTER XLV
  54. CHAPTER XLVI
  55. CHAPTER XLVII
  56. CHAPTER XLVIII
  57. CHAPTER XLIX

I am not disposed to think with many of those who rank the genius of Byron almost as supreme, that he has shown less skill in the construction of his plots, and the development of his tales, than might have been expected from one so splendidly endowed; for it has ever appeared to me that he has accomplished in them everything he proposed to attain, and that in this consists one of his great merits.  His mind, fervid and impassioned, was in all his compositions, except Don Juan, eagerly fixed on the catastrophe.  He ever held the goal full in view, and drove to it in the most immediate manner.  By this straightforward simplicity all the interest which intricacy excites was of necessity disregarded.  He is therefore not treated justly when it is supposed that he might have done better had he shown more art: the wonder is, that he should have produced such magnificent effects with so little.  He could not have made the satiated and meditative Harold so darkling and excursive, so lone, “aweary,” and misanthropical, had he treated him as the hero of a scholastic epic.  The might of the poet in such creations lay in the riches of his diction and in the felicity with which he described feelings in relation to the aspect of scenes amid the reminiscences with which the scenes themselves were associated.

If in language and plan he be so excellent, it may be asked why should he not be honoured with that pre-eminent niche in the temple which so many in the world have by suffrage assigned to him?  Simply because, with all the life and beauty of his style, the vigour and truth of his descriptions, the boldness of his conceptions, and the reach of his vision in the dark abysses of passion, Lord Byron was but imperfectly acquainted with human nature.  He looked but on the outside of man.  No characteristic action distinguishes one of his heroes from another, nor is there much dissimilarity in their sentiments; they have no individuality; they stalk and pass in mist and gloom, grim, ghastly, and portentous, mysterious shadows, entities of the twilight, weird things like the sceptred effigies of the unborn issue of Banquo.