Chapters (40)
- Cover Page
- Title Page
- Dedication
- Prologue A Brief History of Banting
- Part One
- Chapter 1
- Chapter 2
- Chapter 3
- Chapter 4
- Part Two
- Chapter 5
- Chapter 6
- Chapter 7
- Chapter 8
- Chapter 9
- Chapter 10
- Chapter 11
- Chapter 12
- Chapter 13
- Part Three
- Chapter 14
- Chapter 15
- Chapter 16
- Chapter 17
- Chapter 18
- Chapter 19
- Chapter 20
- Chapter 21
- Chapter 22
- Chapter 23
- Chapter 24
- Epilogue
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Acknowledgments
- Illustration Credits
- A Note About the Author
- Also by Gary Taubes
- Footnotes
- Copyright
“This procedure alters…”: Friedman 2004.
“Theories that diseases are…”: Sontag 1990:55. “playable game”: Kuhn 1970:90.
Von Noorden sought: Von Noorden 1907a:694–97.
“As long as we have…”: Interview, Kelly Brownell. “Our culture’s apparent obsession…”: Hill and Peters 1998.
“why then do we not…”: Quoted in Rony 1940:201. Footnote. Starbucks Coffee Company 2006.
Stunkard wrote: Stunkard and McClaren-Hume 1959. Mayer also ridiculed: Mayer 1955.
“Obesity is not a sin…”: Mayer 1968:165.
“Fat Americans…”: Spark 1973.
“the combination of weak will…”: Newburgh and Johnston 1930a:212. “It exists in many non-obese…”: Rony 1940:63.
Ravussin’s basal-metabolic study: Ravussin et al. 1988. The observation in infants: Roberts et al. 1988. “If obesity was only caused…”: Ravussin 1993.
“I was shocked…”: Interview, Eric Ravussin.
“revolution in thinking…”: Whalen 1950. Never embraced this conclusion: See Bruch’s comments in Anon. 1955a:123–24.
“The literature on behavior…”: Bruch and Touraine 1940:204. “Life situations”: Bruch 1940:770.
“critical re-evaluation…”: Bruch 1957:19. “The efficacy of any treatment…”: Bruch 1940:775. “When I began to work…”: Bruch 1957:150–51.
“adequately established…”: Bruch 1957:11–12.
“primary metabolic…” and “Studies of human obesity…”: Bruch 1973:32.
CHAPTER SEVENTEEN:
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY
Epigraph. “The complicated mechanism…”: Rubner 1982:8.
Jean Mayer observed: See Mayer 1954:41–43. See also Mayer 1968.
“The fact remains…”: Brody 1999b.
“Let me state…”: Anon. 1955a:111.
“a plethora of calories”: MacBryde 1951:657.
“primary metabolic…”: Bruch 1973:32.
“separate recognized facts…”: Rony 1940:6.
Compared with growing children: Ibid.:47–49.
Reverse causation, pregnancy, and weight in animals: Wade and Schneider 1992.
“The statement that primary increase…”: Rony 1940:58–59.
Studies of the pre-obese: Ravussin et al. 1988; Roberts et al. 1988. See also Ravussin and Swinburn 1992.
“We cannot get away…”: Yudkin 1959.
“for most adults…”: USDHHS and USDA 2005:14. “There is only one trouble…”: Bruch 1957:25–26.
If we consume an average: Miller and Mumford 1966. “It is conceivable…”: Du Bois 1936:237.
“no stranger phenomenon…”: Ibid.:252.
Gordon Kennedy discussed: Kennedy 1961.
“multiple metabolic control mechanisms”: Cahill and Renold 1965.
Intake and expenditure as dependent variables: See, for instance, Lusk 1928: 170–74; Grafe 1933:136–46; Du Bois 1936:231–69; Kleiber 1961:266–90.
“Changes in…hormones…”: Shetty 1999. “dieting is difficult…”: Frayn 1996:245.
“usual symptoms…”: Keys, Brozek et al. 1950:884.
“spontaneous impulses…”: Rony 1940:48.
“clue to the puzzle” and “react exactly like…”: Anon. 1955a:124. Child’s growth stunted: See, for instance, Ashworth et al. 1968.
Luxuskonsumption: See Du Bois 1936:262–69 and Grafe 1933:139–46 for pre–World War II reviews. Term first used by Neumann: Neumann 1902. A modern review of Neumann’s work can be found in Bennett and Gurin 1982:79–82.
“Food in excess…” and “well within the capacity…”: Lyon and Dunlop 1932.
“The idea that people…”: Garrow 1981:53. Pigs fed low-protein diet: Miller and Payne 1962. Survival advantage: See Sims 1976. Footnote. Baxter 1976.
“thermochemical tangle…”: Rubner 1982:329. For a modern discussion of diet-induced thermogenesis, see Schutz and Jéquier 1998. Rationale for high-protein diets: See, for instance, Jolliffe 1952:48.
As the external environment changes: Rubner 1982:36,329.
Rubner argued: See Krebs 1960. Voit believed: see Du Bois 1936:236 (“impulse to…”).302 Thrifty and spendthrift metabolisms: Pennington 1953b is perhaps the best post–World War II discussion of this concept.