Back Distress
Chapters (38)
  1. Title Page
  2. Technolibération
  3. PART ONE
  4. Chapter 1
  5. Chapter 2
  6. Chapter 3
  7. Chapter 4
  8. Chapter 5
  9. Chapter 6
  10. Chapter 7
  11. Chapter 8
  12. PART TWO
  13. Chapter 9
  14. Chapter 10
  15. Chapter 11
  16. Chapter 12
  17. Chapter 13
  18. Chapter 14
  19. Chapter 15
  20. Chapter 16
  21. Chapter 17
  22. Chapter 18
  23. Chapter 19
  24. PART THREE
  25. Chapter 20
  26. Chapter 21
  27. Chapter 22
  28. Chapter 23
  29. Chapter 24
  30. Chapter 25
  31. Chapter 26
  32. Chapter 27
  33. Chapter 28
  34. PART FOUR
  35. Chapter 29
  36. Chapter 30
  37. Epilogue
  38. Author’s Note

“Yes, but it goes deeper than that. Most people join syndicates which effectively are those kinds of society. People want freedom of choice, but they also want a degree of stability. So they enter into agreements which give them a framework in which to organize their lives – agreements which allow for release, of course … but then, most democracies permit emigration. If sixty thousand people in one syndicate agree to pay a portion of their income – subject to audit – into a fund used for health, education, and welfare, disbursed according to policies fleshed out in detail by committees of elected delegates … they may not have a parliament or a head of state, but that still sounds like a socialist democracy to me.”

I said, “So freely chosen ‘government’ isn’t forbidden. But – overall – are you anarchists, or not? Aren’t there universal laws here, which everyone is forced to obey?”

“There are a handful of principles endorsed by a large majority of residents. Basic ideas about freedom from violence and coercion. They’re widely promulgated – and anyone who disagrees with them would be better off not coming here. I won’t split hairs, though; they might as well be laws.

“So are we anarchists, or not?” Munroe mimed indifference. “ Anarchy means ‘no ruler’, not ‘no laws’ … but no one on Stateless loses any sleep contemplating ancient Greek semantics – or the writings of Bakunin, or Proudhon, or Godwin. Sorry, I retract that: about the same percentage of the population as you’d find in Beijing or Paris cares passionately about each of those subjects. But you’ll have to interview one of them, if you want their opinion.

“Personally, I think the word carries too much historical baggage to be salvaged. No great loss. Most of the nineteenth and twentieth century anarchist movements were bogged down, as much as the Marxists, by the question of seizing power from the ruling class. On Stateless that issue was dealt with very simply. In 2025, six employees of a Californian biotech company called EnGeneUity absconded with all the information they needed to make the seed. Much of which was their own work, if not their own property. They also took some engineered cells from various cultures, but too few to be missed. By the time anyone knew that Stateless was growing, there were a few hundred people living here in shifts, and it would have been bad PR to summarily sterilize the place.

“That was our ‘revolution.’ Beats measuring out your life in Molotov cocktails.”

“Except that the theft means you’re saddled with the boycott.”

Munroe shrugged. “The boycott is a great pain. But Stateless under the boycott is still better than the alternative: a company island, every square meter privately owned. It’s bad enough when every decent food crop on the planet is licensed; imagine the ground beneath your feet being the same.”