Chapters (68)
- Cover
- Chapter 1
- Chapter 2
- Chapter 3
- Chapter 4
- Chapter 5
- Chapter 6
- Chapter 7
- Chapter 8
- Chapter 9
- Chapter 10
- Chapter 11
- Chapter 12
- Chapter 13
- Chapter 14
- Chapter 15
- Chapter 16
- Chapter 17
- Chapter 18
- Chapter 19
- Chapter 20
- Chapter 21
- Chapter 22
- Chapter 23
- Chapter 24
- Chapter 25
- Chapter 26
- Chapter 27
- Chapter 28
- Chapter 29
- Chapter 30
- Chapter 31
- Chapter 32
- Chapter 33
- Chapter 34
- Chapter 35
- Chapter 36
- Chapter 37
- Chapter 38
- Chapter 39
- Chapter 40
- Chapter 41
- Chapter 42
- Chapter 43
- Chapter 44
- Chapter 45
- Chapter 46
- Chapter 47
- Chapter 48
- Chapter 49
- Chapter 50
- Chapter 51
- Chapter 52
- Chapter 53
- Chapter 54
- Chapter 55
- Chapter 56
- Chapter 57
- Chapter 58
- Chapter 59
- Chapter 60
- Chapter 61
- Chapter 62
- Chapter 63
- Acknowledgements
- Canelo Crime
- About the Author
- Also by Rachel Lynch
In summary, it was the vet’s belief that whoever did this was hoping to harm the owner of the pets, not just the pets. Her premise was that those who keep pets have a love for them, in most cases, akin to that towards a child, and the animals were all in excellent condition ante-mortem. They were well looked after. Loved. Thus, the pain and terror caused to the animals was apparently deliberately aimed at the owner. Kelly knew that Mary died after the fire and so perhaps she watched her animals die. She certainly witnessed their pain. She remembered what Demi said about who the attack was aimed at: it seemed that it was Mary. The vet’s report continued to say that burning was a particular method of cleansing evidence from the scene. The fire officer had said the same, and Kelly had seen it in other cases.
Animals can’t be witnesses and so it left Kelly with the glaring fact that whoever killed Mary killed her animals because they wanted to hurt Mary with such vehemence that they chose the thing she loved most.
But another attachment caught her eye. It was a photograph of some of the animals’ remaining pieces of flesh. Most of the bodies of the animals had been badly charred and left little fur or skin, however, a few of them had patches remaining and, on three of them, a triangle had been cut with a sharp instrument. The vet confirmed that the cuts were fresh and inflicted before they had time to heal, meaning they were scored into the skin on Friday evening. Possibly by the person who killed them. Kelly stared at the photos. The triangles were neat, small and deliberate. The vet had attached an appendix. She’d noted that she’d never seen any farming branding made in such a manner. She’d also proven, by the way the animal had bled and the blood coagulated, that they were alive when cut. The vet had done some research on the use of any forms of triangle symbolism and learned that alchemic tradition marks the element of sulphur – strongly associated with fire – the symbol of an upward-pointing triangle.
The final attachment was about the dead birds. They were all wrens. The vet, again, had done her homework and had commented that keeping wrens in cages was highly unusual; they were migratory. However, they did come back to the same breeding nests year on year and it was possible that Mary Hales’ garden was a firm favourite, and so the birds would feel comfortable there. She’d handwritten a note next to a photograph of a common wren. ‘Such a shame to see this bird treated in this way. The wren is the king of all birds.’