Back Rabble in Arms
Chapters (75)
  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Dedication
  5. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
  6. ILLUSTRATIONS
  7. I
  8. II
  9. III
  10. IV
  11. V
  12. VI
  13. VII
  14. VIII
  15. IX
  16. X
  17. XI
  18. XII
  19. XIII
  20. XIV
  21. XV
  22. XVI
  23. XVII
  24. XVIII
  25. XIX
  26. XX
  27. XXI
  28. XXII
  29. XXIII
  30. XXIV
  31. XXV
  32. XXVI
  33. XXVII
  34. XXVIII
  35. XXIX
  36. XXX
  37. XXXI
  38. XXXII
  39. XXXIII
  40. XXXIV
  41. XXXV
  42. XXXVI
  43. XXXVII
  44. XXXVIII
  45. XXXIX
  46. XL
  47. XLI
  48. XLII
  49. XLIII
  50. XLIV
  51. XLV
  52. XLVI
  53. XLVII
  54. XLVIII
  55. XLIX
  56. L
  57. LI
  58. LII
  59. LIII
  60. LIV
  61. LV
  62. LVI
  63. LVII
  64. LVIII
  65. LIX
  66. LX
  67. LXI
  68. LXII
  69. LXIII
  70. LXIV
  71. LXV
  72. LXVI
  73. LXVII
  74. LXVIII
  75. LXIX

“For model, one must go back as far as Richard Carvel, but Mr. Roberts has written a better story and a better history. Quite possibly he deserves recognition as having written America’s finest historical novel, certainly one of the best.”

NEW YORK TIMES:

“Arundel is an achievement: a really fine and stirring historical novel. It has a vigor and simplicity seldom achieved. Kenneth Roberts has succeeded splendidly in capturing a fragrance belonging to the past, a faint but indispensable aroma which is the chief charm of a historical novel, and which most American historical novels have notably lacked.”

NEW YORK TRIBUNE:

“In Arundel we have the pure romance of adventure presented with all that force and fire which De Quincey reveals in his Flight of a Tartar Tribe. We shall see a thousand silly sex novels before we see another story so well told as this.”

NEW YORK TELEGRAM:

“If your blood hasn’t been stirred by recent fiction, Arundel will do it.”

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR:

“As a heroic chronicle of a gallant adventure, and as a fascinating story, Arundel is a book of special importance.”

MARGARET DELAND:

“When I think of the thin, tinny novels which tumble from the press to-day, to be forgotten within a few months, I feel that Arundel is a permanent contribution to the literature of this country. I go around telling people to read it, but I despair—until they have read it—of making them realize its quality. It seems to me like a perfectly splendid plum pudding! No, I think it is more than that; I think it is brown bread, and roast beef, and beer! It is the real stuff, and while I congratulate the author upon having written it, I congratulate all of us novel-reading folk even more heartily. How anybody can lap up whipped cream when he can get Arundel, I don’t understand!”

DETROIT NEWS:

“Arundel is one of the best of all novels of the Revolution, and one which will rank with anything ever written about that period.”

CHRONICLES OF ARUNDEL

THE LIVELY LADY

NEW YORK TIMES:

“The Lively Lady is a record of stirring and gallant adventure—one which will be long read and remembered.”

BOSTON AMERICAN:

“The Lively Lady is a little fighting Odyssey of the sea; but the sea episodes, fine as they are, are almost forgotten in those great chapters that bring back to memory the tragic-comic epic of the Dartmoor stone prison and No. 4 house where the gigantic Negro, King Dick, rules and befriends the hero. It is not often a novelist can create an absolutely original figure, alive from top to toe. He is even better than the famous Cap Huff of Arundel, and that is saying a good deal.”

—Prof. Robert E. Rogers.

NEW YORK WORLD:

“The American historical novel is exemplified at its best in The Lively Lady. The book, in our opinion, is a well-nigh perfect performance.”

NEW YORK EVENING POST: