Back Lucky's
Chapters (35)
  1. About Lucky’s
  2. Title page
  3. Dedication
  4. Epigraph
  5. Chapter 1: 2002
  6. Chapter 2: 2002
  7. Chapter 3: 1945
  8. Chapter 4: 1913–1939
  9. Chapter 5: 2002
  10. Chapter 6: 1945
  11. Chapter 7: 1971
  12. Chapter 8: 2002
  13. Chapter 9: 1945–1946
  14. Chapter 10: 2002
  15. Chapter 11: 1938–1945
  16. Chapter 12: 2002
  17. Chapter 13: 1946
  18. Chapter 14: 1972
  19. Chapter 15: 2002
  20. Chapter 16: 1957
  21. Chapter 17: 1965
  22. Chapter 18: 1971
  23. Chapter 19: 1975
  24. Chapter 20: 2002
  25. Chapter 21: 2002
  26. Chapter 22: 1992
  27. Chapter 23: 2002
  28. Chapter 24: 1994
  29. Chapter 25: 2002
  30. Chapter 26: 2002
  31. Author’s Note
  32. Acknowledgements
  33. Praise for Lucky’s
  34. About the author
  35. Copyright page

Valia turned off the light on her way out, and Penny rested for a while, then slept, and in the morning she drafted a follow-up letter to the University of Sydney. She enquired whether they’d received the previous correspondence and references from her headmaster and the head science teacher at her high school. Might there still be time for an interview? There must be a fine art to these letters, thought Penny: some code, some formula that other Australians understood. There must be something she didn’t get right in that first correspondence, and that was why the university hadn’t responded. In her new letter, Penelope Asproyerakas used many words to, in essence, say the following in code: she rejected her father’s expectations and dreamed of being a scientist.

4.

On a Wednesday in July, the Sydney Morning Herald exposed I.W. Asquith’s fraud: he had falsely claimed to have discovered a play from the Hellenistic Period. He lost his British consulate job that Friday. He was guilty of misconduct. The high commissioner, doing the proper thing, came to Sydney and met with Ian at the office.

‘It’s a bloody embarrassment,’ the commissioner said. ‘Turns out this daft play is all your work.’

‘I’m profoundly sorry, sir,’ said Asquith.

‘We can’t have it.’

‘Yes, and I’m ashamed,’ said Asquith. ‘And I understand that diplomats can’t be seen to behave in such ways.’

‘I suppose, yes, in a broad sense you were a diplomat.’

In failure, Asquith confronted certain facts he’d managed to ignore during the lifespan of his fraud: the fabricated play was the product of a wound left by his university education, by his inability to become a scholar of classical literature. That he’d now ruined his civil service career and turned his life into the consequence of common and ineludible disappointments of early adulthood—dissatisfaction with his teachers, frustration with his talent, with the outcome of his education—which were all hurts he should have relinquished but couldn’t, well, this made him feel ever more pathetic. He had allowed himself to be disfigured by the experience of failure. In response Ian Asquith, fond of alcohol, began to drink heavily.