Back Dr. No Save as PDF

Dr. No

Percival Everett
Contents (65)
  1. DR. NO
  2. DR. NO
  3. DR. NO
  4. Existential quantifier
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  9. 5
  10. 6
  11. Miami
  12. 1
  13. 2
  14. 3
  15. 4
  16. 5
  17. 6
  18. Corsica
  19. 1
  20. 2
  21. 3
  22. 4
  23. 5
  24. A bijective function
  25. 1
  26. 2
  27. 3
  28. 4
  29. For all y such that
  30. 1
  31. 2
  32. 3
  33. 4
  34. 5
  35. 6
  36. A distinction between names and other words
  37. 1
  38. 2
  39. 3
  40. 4
  41. 5
  42. Chasing two rabbits
  43. 1
  44. 2
  45. 3
  46. Humpty Dumpty’s extreme practice
  47. 1
  48. 2
  49. 3
  50. 4
  51. 5
  52. Begriff und Gegenstand
  53. 1
  54. 2
  55. 3
  56. 4
  57. 5
  58. Biblical proportions and the fifth postulate
  59. 1
  60. 2
  61. 3
  62. 4
  63. Il n’y a pas de hors-texte
  64. 1
  65. 2
Cover Image

DR. NO

Also by Percival Everett

The Trees

Telephone

The Book of Training by Colonel Hap Thompson of Roanoke, VA, 1843: Annotated from the Library of John C. Calhoun

So Much Blue

Half an Inch of Water

Percival Everett by Virgil Russell

Assumption

I Am Not Sidney Poitier

The Water Cure

Wounded

American Desert

A History of the African-American People [Proposed] by Strom Thurmond as Told to Percival Everett and James Kincaid

Damned If I Do

Grand Canyon, Inc.

Erasure

Glyph

Frenzy

Watershed

Big Picture

The Body of Martin Aguilera

God’s Country

For Her Dark Skin

Zulus

The Weather and Women Treat Me Fair

Cutting Lisa

Walk Me to the Distance

Suder

The One That Got Away

re: (f) gesture

Abstraktion und Einfühlung

Swimming Swimmers Swimming

Trout’s Lie

DR. NO

A Novel

Percival Everett

Graywolf Press

Copyright © 2022 by Percival Everett

The author and Graywolf Press have provided this e-book to you for your personal use only. You may not make this e-book publicly available in any way. Copyright infringement is against the law. If you believe the copy of this e-book you are reading infringes on the author’s copyright, please notify Graywolf Press at: us.macmillanusa.com/piracy.

This publication is made possible, in part, by the voters of Minnesota through a Minnesota State Arts Board Operating Support grant, thanks to a legislative appropriation from the arts and cultural heritage fund. Significant support has also been provided by the McKnight Foundation, the Lannan Foundation, the Amazon Literary Partnership, and other generous contributions from foundations, corporations, and individuals. To these organizations and individuals we offer our heartfelt thanks.

Published by Graywolf Press

212 Third Avenue North, Suite 485

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401

All rights reserved.

www.graywolfpress.org

Published in the United States of America

ISBN 978-1-64445-208-0 (paperback)

ISBN 978-1-64445-191-5 (ebook)

2 4 6 8 9 7 5 3 1

First Graywolf Printing, 2022

Library of Congress Control Number: 2022930735

Cover design: Kapo Ng

For my editor, accomplice, and dear friend, Fiona.

Thank you for our twenty-seven years together.

Don’t go around saying the world owes you a living.

The world owes you nothing. It was here first.

—Mark Twain

DR. NO

Existential quantifier

1

I recall that I am extremely forgetful. I believe I am. I think I know that I am forgetful. Though I remember having forgotten, I cannot recall what it was that I forgot or what forgetting feels like. When I was a kid, my mother tried to convince me that I was forgetful by saying, “Do you remember when you forgot your own birthday?” I think I replied, “How could I?” But it was a trick question. Saying yes would have been an admission of my forgetfulness and saying no would have been an example. “The brain does what it can,” I told her. If we remembered everything, we would have no language for remembering and forgetting. As well, nothing would be important. In fact, nothing is important. The importance of nothing is that it is the measure of that which is not nothing. Is nothing the same as nothingness? Students love to imagine such things. There is in fact no nothing; the simplistic argument for this assertion is that the observation of nothing requires an observer, and so the presence of the onlooker negates what might have been pure absence, what might have actually been nothing. If nothing falls in a forest and there is no one around to observe it, does it make a nil? The better argument, one that embodies the simple one and any other, is that one can spell nothing. Parmenides might have been a shabby dresser, but he had a point. The ontological argument might not have worked for the existence of God, but it is indisputable for the existence of nothing. Ei mitään, rien, nada, nicht, nic, dim byd, ikke noget, ingenting, waxba, tidak ada, boten, apa-apa, kitn, nihil, and nenio. Kind of an ontological argument for the existence of nothing.