Chapters (42)
- Title Page
- Copyright Notice
- Dedication
- City of Saints and Madmen
- Dradin, in Love
- 1
- The Hoegbotton Guide to the Early History of the City of Ambergris
- 1
- The Cage
- 1
- The Transformation of Martin Lake
- The Strange Case of X
- Shriek: An Afterword
- AN AFTERWORD TO THE EARLY HISTORY OF AMBERGRIS
- PART I
- 1
- 5
- PART II
- 1
- 4
- A (BRIEF) AFTERWORD BY SIRIN
- Finch
- MONDAY
- 1
- TUESDAY
- 1
- WEDNESDAY
- 1
- THURSDAY
- 1
- FRIDAY
- 1
- SATURDAY
- 1
- SUNDAY
- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- Illustration credits
- NOTES
- Notes 2
- Also by Jeff Vandermeer
- A Note About the Author
- Newsletter Sign-up
(“What do you want?” he asked, never looking up from his work. He didn’t need to look up. I could guess our connection from the faint black stippling around his chin, his ears. He had been underground. And when he finally did look up, he recognized the same in me. After that, any reluctance on his part was mere economics.)
For Lacond, by fate or fortune, or both, was the founder of the Ambergrisians for the Original Inhabitants Society, a historical organization known for its outlandish theories and high fatality rates. As Duncan wrote in his Early History of Ambergris several years later:
Never has membership in a historical society been so fraught with peril. Every two or three years, another few members succumb to the temptation to pry open a manhole cover and go spelunking among the sewer drains. Inevitably, someone gets stuck in a drainpipe and the others go for help, or the gray caps, presumably, catch them and they disappear forever. One imagines the helpful AFTOIS members waving their official membership cards at the approaching, unimpressed gray caps. When not conspiring to commit assisted suicide, the AFTOIS publishes The Real History Newsletter.
This newsletter would later become Duncan’s eccentric flagship as he led a fearless crew of “fringe historians” into the uncharted and unclaimed waters of Oblivion. These hardy men and women subsisted at the far reaches of popular acclaim and derived what little sustenance they could from peripheral mentions in the lesser-known broadsheets and journals—lingering in the brackish backwaters of footnotes in papers by their more famous colleagues. (Mary’s footnotes would eventually take on this preservative quality, often the only extant mention of any number of historians, myself included. Although some felt gratitude, for most living in the margins proved a grim and unfulfilling existence.)
Our dad loved historians, of course, but he had always hated journalists. He considered them the juvenile, larval stage of the historian, and as with certain reptilian or insect species that eat their own young, he believed they should be done away with for society’s greater good. I remember he used to call journalists “Historians without the wisdom of perspective.”
As Duncan used to say, though, after the war, “Father was wrong. Journalists are just frightened people with notepads who are trying very hard not to get killed.” It was, paradoxically, a boring time, what with all the running around. All we did was skulk and hide, then run somewhere. Record what we saw—the aftermath of an explosion, an outbreak of illness, a battle—run somewhere else. Hide. Report. Run. Hide. Report. Run.
“Bring me the story!” Lacond used to bellow from his chosen spot behind the typesetting machine. “There’s a story out there—find it now!”
Even as, some weeks, he was reduced to paying us for those stories with bread, vegetables, and milk.